Suppose a compliance platform is priced at $12,000 per year. Is it expensive?
It depends on what you are replacing.
If $12,000 can be used to cut down on hundreds of hours in repetitive evidence gathering across an intricate technological landscape, it could be money wisely invested. If a company of seven could collect the same information in a couple of hours every month, the calculation is very different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the best features is not the first step. Think about what features help your business save time and work.
The Break-Even point for automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. Scale can alter its value. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments as well as various applications. The burden of manually collecting evidence constantly could be extremely difficult. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and gather evidence are able to justify their costs.
Think about a company with 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. It could have a tiny infrastructure, and gathering of evidence can be handled with minimal automation.
The distinction is crucial when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of an advanced platform are impressive, however they only provide financial value when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture And Not Just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a discussion that is a simple feature by feature exercise. Both platforms are based on automation and integration, so organizations looking for this type of approach will benefit from looking at the frameworks they support with their integrations, service along with individual quotes and contracts.
However, there’s another choice you need to make. Do you need a Compliance platform that integrates? Some businesses favor continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some companies prefer to create their own evidence, particularly when their workload is small.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the same model
Several well-known Vanta competitors compete in a category that has a similar focus on automation. There are also more lightweight platforms that focus on management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter category. CertAssist is a product developed by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, organizes the controls frameworks into a single workspace. It offers editable guidelines and policies for evidence and allows auditors to review evidence via read-only access.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers upload their own documentation.
Be aware of the system access.
It is obvious that removing integrations is a disadvantage. It is necessary to collect evidence by hand.
It also gets rid of integration setup and ensures that the compliance software does not require connections to the company’s operational environment.
The structures of one are not superior to each other. The relevant question is which tradeoff makes sense for your company.
CertAssist is aimed at teams that comprise between five and 200 people and publishes its prices rather than needing a sales conversation to obtain the starting figure. Its advertised launch price is $225 per month compared with a regular price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Have Its Proper Place
The needs of a 10-person business today will not necessarily be the same for a company with 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple A lightweight platform could be a good idea. When systems, employees frameworks, and evidence requirements expand, the economics may ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity play a role when you purchase compliance technology.
Don’t buy fifty integrations just because they look impressive on a comparison chart. You should purchase them only when you realize that the cost of the work manually is more expensive.
